Amigos en Acción
Returning after time out
We Had It in 1984 — Eighty-Five Point Five

Returning after time out

A career break is a gap on a résumé and not a gap in ability. Several employers now recruit for exactly this.

A woman working at dual monitors with code on the screen — licensed illustration, not a person in the statistic. We Had It in 1984 — Eighty-Five Point Five — returnship.
A woman working at dual monitors with code on the screen. Licensed illustration — not a person in the statistic. Photo: Pexels
Home › We Had It in 1984 › Eighty-Five Point Five › Returning after time out

Open, but nobody has to teach you

A woman teaching at the front of a classroom — licensed illustration, not a person in the statistic. We Had It in 1984 — Eighty-Five Point Five — returnship.
A woman teaching at the front of a classroom. Licensed illustration — not a person in the statistic. Photo: Unsplash

A large number of women leave the workforce or step back from it for caregiving and then find that the résumé gap is treated as the disqualifying fact. It is worth being precise about what actually decayed: specific tools and frameworks, which are learnable in weeks, rather than the capacity to do the work.

Structured return-to-work programmes, often called returnships, exist at a growing number of large employers and are paid, fixed-term, and explicitly aimed at people with a multi-year gap. They are not charity and they are not junior roles; they exist because employers discovered that this is an unusually strong and unusually cheap talent pool.

Three things make a return easier. A current certification, because it is dated and dates the skills rather than the gap. A small piece of recent visible work. And naming the gap plainly in one line rather than leaving a reader to guess at it — a stated career break reads very differently from an unexplained one.

WIOA funds training for people re-entering the workforce through local workforce boards, in every county. Displaced homemakers are a named category in that system.

Anyone may walk in. No one is obliged to instruct you, follow up with you, or notice when you stop.

The arc, in one table

Academic yearWomen's share of US computer science bachelor's degrees
1983–84 — the peak37.1%
1984–8536.8%
1985–8635.7%
2007–08 — the floor17.6%
2008–0917.8%
2021–22 — most recent22.6%

Computed from the degree counts published in NCES Digest of Education Statistics Table 325.35, which covers computer and information sciences. The table prints counts, not shares, so these percentages are our arithmetic on its numbers and can be checked against it directly.

What is already paid for

Programme names, amounts and deadlines change. These are the doors; verify current terms with the source before counting on a number.

All eight routesThe campaign

Sources. Degree shares: computed from the counts in NCES Digest of Education Statistics Table 325.35 (computer and information sciences) and Table 318.10 for all fields; the table publishes counts rather than percentages, so the shares here are our arithmetic on its numbers and can be checked against it. Occupation shares and earnings: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey Tables 11 and 39, 2025 annual averages — the earnings figures are unadjusted occupational-group medians, not a controlled like-for-like comparison, and we say so. High school enrolment: Code.org Advocacy Coalition, State of Computer Science Education, 2023–24. AP exam composition: computed from the male and female counts in the College Board AP Program Summary Report 2025. Attrition: Accenture and Girls Who Code, Resetting Tech Culture, 2020 — the comparison there is women in technology against women in other work, not women against men, and we state it that way. Earnings effect of one course: Liu, Conrad & Blazar, EdWorkingPaper 24-904. County classifications: USDA Economic Research Service County Typology Codes; labour markets: 2020 Commuting Zones. County counts are computed from the committed county file at build time, not asserted.

Photographs on this campaign are licensed stock used as illustration — not portraits of the people inside the federal counts. Full credits: CREDITS.md.